Assessment Of Alternatives To Face-to-face Interviews In Snap

 

To examine how/if eliminating the client interview for SNAP benefits affects administration of the SNAP program and client outcomes.

Deleted 02/05/2016 (Archived.) 10.588 Agency: Department of Agriculture
Office: Food and Nutrition Service Cooperative Agreements Fiscal Year 2013: Three states received awards to participate in the study. The pilots ended in the fall of 2013. Data from the pilots is currently being analyzed and compiled in an evaluation report. To date, there are no results to report. Fiscal Year 2014: No Current Data Available Fiscal Year 2015: No Current Data Available The Food Stamp Act of 2008 , Section 17 (a)(1). Allowable use of funds includes, but is not limited to, personnel costs; office and research supplies; travel for data collection; and technology (both hardware and software) necessary for operating the Cooperative Agreement. This project will be beneficial to both state and local SNAP offices, as it will inform them of how eliminating the face-to-face interview for SNAP applicants affects the administration of the program. The clients, in turn, will benefit from the project because the findings of the study will be used by the state and local offices to improve their administration of the program. No Credentials or documentation are required. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87. Preapplication coordination is not applicable. Environmental impact information is not required for this program. This program is excluded from coverage under E.O. 12372. OMB Circular No. A-102 applies to this program. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-110. Applicants will submit their response to the RFA through grants.gov. FNS will prescreen all applications to ensure that they contain the required documents and information. If an application does not include all appropriate information, FNS will consider the application to be non-responsive and will eliminate it from further evaluation.

Following the initial screening process, FNS will assemble a panel to review and determine the technical merits of each application based on how it addresses the required application components. The panel will award the grants to applicants whose application best demonstrates the capacity to implement and operate the pilots. Preference will be given to those applications that address all of the criteria completely, explain in detail how the pilot will be designed and implemented, and show capacity and willingness to cooperate fully with the data collection and evaluation. In addition, the applications that best detail a process for collecting the necessary information from clients to verify cases with minimal contact under the no interview model will merit higher scores. Additional points will also be given to states applying for the regular evaluation but have the capacity to conduct more than the minimum suggested QC-like reviews at the pilot site.

The selection official will consider the panel’s recommendations. The selection official may consider other FNS priorities, such as geographic, demographic, socioeconomic diversity or size of QC sample in addition to the scores assigned by the technical review panel. FNS reserves the option to select one or more lower-rated applications in order to achieve a diversity of projects and regional representation. Not Applicable. From 30 to 60 days. From 30 to 60 days. Not Applicable. Applications must adhere to the format described in the RFA. The application must include:

Cover Sheet
Table of Contents
1. Application Summary (1 page limit)
2. Pilot Design and Implementation (20 page limit)
3. The application should also specifically address the following questions.
• How would implementing the no interview model change the overall processing of cases?
• How will the state handle subgroups in the pilot area that are receiving a different interview method under a current waiver?
• How will the state handle walk-in clients at the no interview site?
• If a client asks for a face-to-face interview at a no interview site, how will that be tracked for data purposes?
• Will the no interview model change the way expedited cases are processed?
• How will the state implement the pilot to reduce the potential of increased error rates and erroneous denials?
• What is the level of modernization in place in the state and how does that affect the pilot site? Indicate if there will be additional changes in the pilot or comparison areas or the state during the study.
• What is the state’s capacity for conducting QC-like reviews and their ability to provide the data required by the evaluator? How many reviews can the state conduct and over what time period? Explain any deviation from the suggested number of interviews or timeline.

4. Staffing and Management of the Grant. Assistance shall be used to defray the cost for the states to implement the demonstrations and participate in the evaluation of the demonstrations. No program reports are required. No cash reports are required. Quarterly progress reports from each participating state will provide details about the status of the demonstartions. No expenditure reports are required. The external third party evaluator will monitor the demonstartions and conduct the evaluation. No audits are required for this program. No Data Available. This program has no statutory formula.
This program has no matching requirements.
This program does not have MOE requirements. 28 months - September 2011 through December 2013. See the following for information on how assistance is awarded/released: Four equal installments. None. Rosemarie Downer 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22302 Email: rosemarie.downer@fns.usda.gov Phone: 7033052129 Fax: 7033052576 No Data Available 12-3505-0-1-605. (Salaries) FY 13 Not Separately Identifiable; FY 14 est $0; and FY 15 Not Separately Identifiable No Data Available. Not Applicable. Not Applicable.